美国Stony Brook大学教授现象学家Donn Welton 在北大外哲所会议室（老化学楼2楼）将作关于躯体现象学的学术报告
来源：学术进展
作者：
时间：2002-10-13
美国 Stony Brook大学教授现象学家Donn Welton 在北大外哲所会议室（老化学楼2楼）作关于躯体现象学的学术报告,具体时间为
2002年10月29日上午8：30-11：30
30日下午1：30-4：30
31日上午 8：30-11：30
欢迎大家光临。
Seminar One
From Consciousness to the Body
Introduction
a. Husserl‘s account of the body
b. A superficial distinction between physical body (K?rper) and lived body (Leib).
c. Difficulties in using difference in types of sensations or perceptions as the sufficient criterion for a characterization of the lived-body
d. Difficulties in the relationship between lived-body and action
A. Bridge to a philosophical account of the body: the spatialization of consciousness. Summary of article.
B. The account of the lived body (Leib) in Merleau-Ponty
1. The notion of body schema
2. The difference between body schema and body representations
C. Clarifying the difference between body image and body schema
1. Body image
a. Body percepts
b. Body concepts
c. Emotional stances toward the body
2. Body schema
a. Motor programs
b. Proprioception
c. Orientational perceptions
3. The difference between body schemata and perceptual schemata
D. Two plus two case studies
1. Schneider: the prevalence of the body schema and the loss of body image
2. I.W.: the dominance of the body image and the loss of body schema
3. Body schema and body image in cases of anorexia and bulimia
Seminar Two
Phantom Limbs, Machines, and Transformations of Perception
A. Four modalities of the body‘s involvement with machines
Body-Machine Relation Body Schema Body Image Perceptual Schemata
1. Expansion Augmentation Supplementation Amplification
2. Mirroring Modification Animation Phantasmal
3. Bionic Attachment Integration and kinaesthetic elaboration Expansion Amplification
4. Bionic Incorporation Transformation Invasion Transmutation
B. Body schemata and social construction
1. Summary of the account of body image and body schema in radical social constructionist accounts
2. Body schemata and the question of innateness in Merleau-Ponty
3. Assessing evidence for innateness
a. Phantom limbs
b. Joint attention
c. Imitation
C. Symptoms as intercorporeal actions and the transformation of perception: the case of Frau D.
Seminar Three
The Body and the Concept of "Actional Intentionality"
Introduction
a. Summary of three different noetic-noematic structures (Zusammenfassung von drei verscheidenen noetisch-noematischen Structuren)
Type of ActArt des Aktes bzw. der Handlung Noesis NoemaMeaning or sense-structuresBedeutungs- bzw. Sinnstrukture ReferenceReferenz
· Propositional discourse· Propositionaler Diskurs · Claiming· Questioning· Behaupten· Fragen · X as [concept]· Schemata of Distinctions· X als [Begriff]· Unterscheidungs-schemata · Fact as fulfillment ? epistemic perception· Tatsache als Erfullung ?Epistemische Wahrnehmung
§ Beschreibende Rede§ Descriptive talk § Presenting§ Believing§ Vorstellen§ Glauben · States of affairs presented through schemata of differentiation· Sachverhalt durch Diffenzierungsschemata vorgestellt
§ Perception (non-epistemic)§ Wahrnehmung (nicht-epistemische) § "Circumspection"§ Body schemata§ § “Umsichten”§ Leib-schemata § Profiles/object grasped through schemata of discrimination § Profile/Gegenstand durch Diskrimminierungsschemata in Griff bekommen
b. Situating action in terms of the relationship between intentionality and body
A. From movement to action: the concept of "affordances" (Aufforderungs-charaketere)
B. Three models of the relationship between intentionality and action
1. Internal model
2. External model
3. Intrinsic model
C. Elements of a theory of actional intentionality
1. Directed transcendence vs. ambiguous transcendence
2. Unencumbered vs. inhibited intentionality
3. Continuos vs. discontinuous unity
D. The organization of contested space
1. Spatial vectors and spatial coordinates
a. Bodily vectors are intra-bodily and account for how our tacit awareness of the body is spatially organized:
§ head-foot
§ side-side
§ rear-aft
b. Bodily vectors undergird the constitution of the perception of the objects of lived-space with its static bodily coordinates of
top-bottom
§ left-right
§ back-front
§ near-far,
c. In addition there are also dynamic bodily coordinates of
· upward-downward
· leftward-rightward
· closer-further
2. Space as lived
a. Open vs. enclosed space
b. Continuous vs. double space
c. Positioned in space
E. Concluding Remarks
2002年10月29日上午8：30-11：30
30日下午1：30-4：30
31日上午 8：30-11：30
欢迎大家光临。
Seminar One
From Consciousness to the Body
Introduction
a. Husserl‘s account of the body
b. A superficial distinction between physical body (K?rper) and lived body (Leib).
c. Difficulties in using difference in types of sensations or perceptions as the sufficient criterion for a characterization of the lived-body
d. Difficulties in the relationship between lived-body and action
A. Bridge to a philosophical account of the body: the spatialization of consciousness. Summary of article.
B. The account of the lived body (Leib) in Merleau-Ponty
1. The notion of body schema
2. The difference between body schema and body representations
C. Clarifying the difference between body image and body schema
1. Body image
a. Body percepts
b. Body concepts
c. Emotional stances toward the body
2. Body schema
a. Motor programs
b. Proprioception
c. Orientational perceptions
3. The difference between body schemata and perceptual schemata
D. Two plus two case studies
1. Schneider: the prevalence of the body schema and the loss of body image
2. I.W.: the dominance of the body image and the loss of body schema
3. Body schema and body image in cases of anorexia and bulimia
Seminar Two
Phantom Limbs, Machines, and Transformations of Perception
A. Four modalities of the body‘s involvement with machines
Body-Machine Relation Body Schema Body Image Perceptual Schemata
1. Expansion Augmentation Supplementation Amplification
2. Mirroring Modification Animation Phantasmal
3. Bionic Attachment Integration and kinaesthetic elaboration Expansion Amplification
4. Bionic Incorporation Transformation Invasion Transmutation
B. Body schemata and social construction
1. Summary of the account of body image and body schema in radical social constructionist accounts
2. Body schemata and the question of innateness in Merleau-Ponty
3. Assessing evidence for innateness
a. Phantom limbs
b. Joint attention
c. Imitation
C. Symptoms as intercorporeal actions and the transformation of perception: the case of Frau D.
Seminar Three
The Body and the Concept of "Actional Intentionality"
Introduction
a. Summary of three different noetic-noematic structures (Zusammenfassung von drei verscheidenen noetisch-noematischen Structuren)
Type of ActArt des Aktes bzw. der Handlung Noesis NoemaMeaning or sense-structuresBedeutungs- bzw. Sinnstrukture ReferenceReferenz
· Propositional discourse· Propositionaler Diskurs · Claiming· Questioning· Behaupten· Fragen · X as [concept]· Schemata of Distinctions· X als [Begriff]· Unterscheidungs-schemata · Fact as fulfillment ? epistemic perception· Tatsache als Erfullung ?Epistemische Wahrnehmung
§ Beschreibende Rede§ Descriptive talk § Presenting§ Believing§ Vorstellen§ Glauben · States of affairs presented through schemata of differentiation· Sachverhalt durch Diffenzierungsschemata vorgestellt
§ Perception (non-epistemic)§ Wahrnehmung (nicht-epistemische) § "Circumspection"§ Body schemata§ § “Umsichten”§ Leib-schemata § Profiles/object grasped through schemata of discrimination § Profile/Gegenstand durch Diskrimminierungsschemata in Griff bekommen
b. Situating action in terms of the relationship between intentionality and body
A. From movement to action: the concept of "affordances" (Aufforderungs-charaketere)
B. Three models of the relationship between intentionality and action
1. Internal model
2. External model
3. Intrinsic model
C. Elements of a theory of actional intentionality
1. Directed transcendence vs. ambiguous transcendence
2. Unencumbered vs. inhibited intentionality
3. Continuos vs. discontinuous unity
D. The organization of contested space
1. Spatial vectors and spatial coordinates
a. Bodily vectors are intra-bodily and account for how our tacit awareness of the body is spatially organized:
§ head-foot
§ side-side
§ rear-aft
b. Bodily vectors undergird the constitution of the perception of the objects of lived-space with its static bodily coordinates of
top-bottom
§ left-right
§ back-front
§ near-far,
c. In addition there are also dynamic bodily coordinates of
· upward-downward
· leftward-rightward
· closer-further
2. Space as lived
a. Open vs. enclosed space
b. Continuous vs. double space
c. Positioned in space
E. Concluding Remarks